Comparative analysis on communication back-channels between mainland chinese and malay

Komunikasi saluran belakang merentas budaya: pandangan daripada perbualan masyarakat cina tanah besar dan melayu

Authors

  • Suo Yanju Faculty of Major Language Studies, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Bandar Baru Nilai, 71800 Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4925-0452

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v8i2.235

Keywords:

Non-verbal communication, backchannels, foreign language teaching, Mainland Chinese and Malay

Abstract

Significant research has been conducted on the similarities and differences in back-channel communication between different languages, such as Japanese and English. Recently, interest has grown in examining the back-channel communication between speakers of different target languages. This study investigates the use of back channels between mainland Chinese and Malay speakers. This study aims to identify and compare the use of these back channels to improve our understanding of intercultural communication dynamics. Ten Malay and ten Chinese female students from higher education institutions in Malaysia participated in this study. Conversations were recorded and analysed. Both similarities and differences were identified in the use of verbal and non-verbal back channels between Chinese and Malay speakers. The study highlighted specific cultural nuances that affect back-channel communication, which can influence how cues are interpreted and responded to in intercultural settings.  Insights gained can help reduce misunderstandings and improve communication efficacy between speakers of these languages. The findings provide valuable insights into intercultural communication dynamics and contribute to the field of language teaching by integrating cultural nuances into foreign language curricula. This approach can enhance learners' communication competence by making them more aware of culturally specific back-channel cues.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adiba, A., I., Homma, T., & Miyoshi, T. (2021). Immediate back-channel generation using an Attention-Based Early Prediction model. Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp39728.2021.9414193

Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, L. K., & Valerie Lynn Manusov. (2021). Nonverbal communication. Routledge.

Clancy P.M., Thompson S. A., Suzuki R., Tao H.Y. (1996). The conversational use of reactive tokens in English, Japanese, and Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 355–387.

Eshimov, M. P., Nurtileuova, S. R., & Kulmanov, S. K. (2022). Nonverbal Components of Communication: Similarities and Differences Tìltanym, 86(2), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.55491/2411-6076-2022-2-16-25

Heinz, B. (2003). Back-channel responses are strategic responses in bilingual speakers’ conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1113-1142.

Jabber, K. W. and Mahmood, A. A. (2020). Non-verbal Communication between Two Non-native English Speakers: Iraqi and Chinese. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1002.06

Kjellmer, G. (2009). Where do we go back channel? On the use of mm, mhm, uhhuh and such like. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(1), 81-112.

Kleinová, A. (2019). Non-verbal Communication across Cultures: Gestures and Facial Expressions at Business Meetings and Negotiations in China and Italy. https://digilib.k.utb.cz/handle/10563/48705

Koeda, M., Belin, P., Hama, T., Masuda, T., Matsuura, M., & Okubo, Y. (2013). Cross-Cultural differences in the processing of Non-Verbal affective vocalizations by Japanese and Canadian listeners. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00105

Kroczek, L. O. H., Pfaller, M., Lange, B., Müller, M., & Mühlberger, A. (2020). Interpersonal Distance during Real-Time Social Interaction: Insights from subjective experience, behavior, and physiology. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00561

Li, H. Z. (2006). Backchannel responses are misleading feedback in intercultural discourse. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35(2), 99–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750600909253

Li, H. Z., Cui, Y., & Wang, Z. (2010). Backchannel responses and enjoyment of the conversation: the more does not necessarily mean the better. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v2n1p25

Li, Y. (2022). An investigation into interpersonal space and conversation distances of Chinese people for different artwork styles and genders. AHFE International. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001806

Nataša, Bakić-Mirić., Anita, Jankovic. (2022). The role of nonverbal codes in intercultural communication. Zbornik radova Filozofskog fakulteta, 52(1):95-112. Https://doi: 10.5937/zrffp52-33723

Nurjaleka, L. (2023). Backchannels respond as conversational strategies in the interaction of Indonesian speakers in an interview setting. REiLA, 5(2), 99–114. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v5i2.13889

Pan, Q. (2014). Nonverbal teacher-student communication in the foreign language classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(12). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.12.2627-2632

Shen, C. (2023). Nonverbal communication in Intercultural Communication: A Case study of Telling Lies. Frontiers in Educational Research, 6(13). https://doi.org/10.25236/fer.2023.061308

Zhao, Y. (2022). A study of nonverbal communication in China-U.S. business negotiations. Studies in Social Science & Humanities, 1(4), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.56397/sssh.2022.11.04

Zhang, M. (2021). Research on Cross-Cultural differences in nonverbal communication between America and China. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research/Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210806.181

Published

2024-12-28

How to Cite

Yanju, S. (2024). Comparative analysis on communication back-channels between mainland chinese and malay: Komunikasi saluran belakang merentas budaya: pandangan daripada perbualan masyarakat cina tanah besar dan melayu. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 8(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v8i2.235