Incorporation of Sustainable Development Goal 4 in Biology Curriculum Design: A Case Study

Authors

  • Lai Ti Gew Department of Biological Sciences, School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, 47500 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Annyza Tumar Academic Enhancement Division, Sunway University, 47500 Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v7i1.131

Keywords:

SDG 4; curriculum design; learning outcomes; assessments; employability; higher education.

Abstract

Curriculum design needs to be undertaken at both programme and subject level. The programme structure needs to enable the graduates to also acquire integrative biotechnology laboratory skills and employability skills. Module-specific knowledge and skills are essentially important, but they are meaningless on their own. This paper focuses on the review of one subject, i.e. BIO 2134 Instrumental Analysis, with the aim of examining the targets in Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 - particularly Target 4.4 on increasing the number of people with relevant skills for financial success (employability skills), and Target 4.7 on education for sustainable development and global citizenship – and how they can be better achieved. We focused on the learning outcomes (LOs), assessments, and teaching and learning activities. First, we refined the 4 LOs to 3 to reduce overlaps and repetitions, as well as to improve students’ assessment workload. Secondly, we expanded the scope of one of the assessments by including the element of entrepreneurship into the research proposal. The study can provide very useful information for a larger scale review of the curriculum redesign to probe if similar changes can be done for other modules in the programme to be aligned with the SGDs agenda and its action of framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akcay, B. (2009). Problem-based learning in science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 28-38.

Barker, S., Slingsby, D., & Tilling, S. (2002). Teaching biology outside the classroom. Is it heading for extinction, 14-19.

Fitzgerald, P. (2016). Embedding Employability into the Curriculum: An Enterprise Based Module for the Biosciences. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, 4(2), 33-39.

Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Educational Research Review, 28, 100293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293

Hughes, I. (2002). Employment and employability for pharmacology graduates. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 1(10), 833-833. doi:10.1038/nrd925

Knapp, D. (2000). Memorable experiences of a science field trip. School Science and Mathematics, 100(2), 65-72.

Knipfer, C., Wagner, F., Knipfer, K., Millesi, G., Acero, J., Hueto, J., & Nkenke, E. (2019). Learners’ acceptance of a webinar for continuing medical education. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 48(6), 841-846.

Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future Competences and the Future of Curriculum. Retrieved from International Bureau of Education website: http://www. ibe. unesco. org/en/news/document-future-competences-and-future-curriculum.

Rudmann, C. L. (1994). A review of the use and implementation of science field trips. School Science and Mathematics, 94(3), 138-141.

Watts, C., Wray, K., Kennedy, C., Freeman, P., & Trainer, G. (2010). Embedding enterprise in biosciences: added value for employability. Industry and Higher Education, 24(6), 487-494.

Yorke, M. (2006). Employability in higher education: what it is-what it is not (Vol. 1): Higher Education Academy York.

Published

2023-06-23

How to Cite

Gew, L. T., & Tumar, A. (2023). Incorporation of Sustainable Development Goal 4 in Biology Curriculum Design: A Case Study. ATTARBAWIY: Malaysian Online Journal of Education, 7(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.53840/attarbawiy.v7i1.131